Okay, so we all know that the elections were rigged and results for some of the polling stations were changed. But do you really think that the number of non-genuine votes was so high that it actually resulted in candidates losing their seats?
Last Edit: Jun 2, 2013 17:01:33 GMT 5 by chaosintown
I think it is only a media projection that only a few polling stations were rigged. A little portion is what media was able to catch, rest what was behind the scenes, no 1 knows. I feel most of the stations were rigged in either prominent or hidden way.
I fully agree with admin. Most of the polling stations in rural areas were rigged. Media only projected the ones in urban areas. For example, in Bannu (KPK) nearly all the rural polling stations were rigged. Is it not rigging that a KHAN or MALIK of area stands beside you and you have to stamp in front of him? This kind of rigging was done by JUI-F. This type of rigging is prevalent because mostly, in villages, govt schools are polling stations and the local Maliks (Malik in KPK=Chaudhry in Punjab) practically own those schools, as they are build on their land. Many of the schools are used as hujra as well. So parties like JUI-F buy these maliks and the votes are guaranteed by maliks. If army had been deployed inside polling stations in KPK, PTI would have won more seats.